This thesis investigates the nuanced and multifaceted concept of contemporaneity and its profound implications within the realm of architecture theory. The exploration begins with an in-depth philosophical inquiry into the nature of the present, drawing on the works of Jacques Derrida, Boris Groys, and Giorgio Agamben. Derrida's concept of "différance" and Groys' analysis of the mediated present in digital culture challenge traditional notions of time, suggesting that the present is a constructed illusion constantly slipping into the past and future. Agamben furthers this discourse by asserting that true contemporaneity involves a dual engagement with one's era, balancing immersion and detachment to critically address the complexities of the present. Building on this theoretical foundation, the thesis delves into the intrinsic relationship between architecture and its theoretical underpinnings. Teresa Stoppani's assertions in "This Thing Called Theory" highlight the indispensable role of architecture theory, positioning it as a critical component that shapes and defines architectural practice. Stoppani, along with scholars like Charles Jencks and K. Michael Hays, emphasizes the dynamic and evolving nature of architecture theory, which continually challenges conventions and fosters deeper understanding through interdisciplinary engagements. The thesis employs an abductive methodology to explore the integration of contemporaneity into architecture theory, using three key terms: "souvenir," "kitsch," and "formless." These terms are selected for their relevance to contemporary discourse and their potential to redefine architectural practices. "Souvenir" symbolizes the temporal interpolation of past and present; "kitsch" reflects the prevailing aesthetic enriched with sentimentality and satire; and "formless" challenges the conventional focus on tangible, structured objects in architecture. Through case studies and post-critical categories, the thesis demonstrates how these concepts can serve as a foundation for architects to reinterpret and demand changes in our built environment, fostering the development of architecture theory that is responsive to contemporary challenges. The ultimate goal is to provide a basis for future architectural practice that embraces the limitless possibilities of redefining and requestioning.
Questa tesi indaga il concetto sfaccettato e complesso della contemporaneità e le sue profonde implicazioni nel campo della teoria dell'architettura. L'esplorazione inizia con un'approfondita indagine filosofica sulla natura del presente, basandosi sui lavori di Jacques Derrida, Boris Groys e Giorgio Agamben. Il concetto di "différance" di Derrida e l'analisi di Groys del presente mediato nella cultura digitale mettono in discussione le nozioni tradizionali di tempo, suggerendo che il presente è un'illusione costruita che scivola costantemente nel passato e nel futuro. Agamben approfondisce questo discorso affermando che la vera contemporaneità implica un duplice impegno con la propria era, bilanciando immersione e distacco per affrontare criticamente le complessità del presente. Basandosi su queste fondamenta teoriche, la tesi si immerge nella relazione intrinseca tra architettura e le sue basi teoriche. Le affermazioni di Teresa Stoppani in "This Thing Called Theory" evidenziano il ruolo indispensabile della teoria dell'architettura, posizionandola come componente critica che plasma e definisce la pratica architettonica. Stoppani, insieme a studiosi come Charles Jencks e K. Michael Hays, sottolinea la natura dinamica ed evolutiva della teoria dell'architettura, che sfida continuamente le convenzioni e promuove una comprensione più profonda attraverso gli impegni interdisciplinari. La tesi utilizza una metodologia abduttiva per esplorare l'integrazione della contemporaneità nella teoria dell'architettura, utilizzando tre termini chiave: "souvenir," "kitsch" e "informale." Questi termini sono selezionati per la loro rilevanza nel discorso contemporaneo e per il loro potenziale di ridefinire le pratiche architettoniche. "Souvenir" simboleggia l'interpolazione temporale tra passato e presente; "kitsch" riflette l'estetica prevalente arricchita di sentimentalità e satira; e "informale" sfida il focus convenzionale sugli oggetti tangibili e strutturati nell'architettura. Attraverso case studio e post-categorie critiche, la tesi dimostra come questi concetti possano servire come base per gli architetti per reinterpretare e richiedere cambiamenti nel nostro ambiente costruito, favorendo lo sviluppo di una teoria architettonica che risponda alle sfide contemporanee. L'obiettivo finale è fornire una base per la pratica architettonica futura che abbracci le possibilità illimitate di ridefinizione e riconsiderazione.
3 Out of infinity : a study of architecture theory and contemporary
Rahmatullah, Bimo Imbalo
2023/2024
Abstract
This thesis investigates the nuanced and multifaceted concept of contemporaneity and its profound implications within the realm of architecture theory. The exploration begins with an in-depth philosophical inquiry into the nature of the present, drawing on the works of Jacques Derrida, Boris Groys, and Giorgio Agamben. Derrida's concept of "différance" and Groys' analysis of the mediated present in digital culture challenge traditional notions of time, suggesting that the present is a constructed illusion constantly slipping into the past and future. Agamben furthers this discourse by asserting that true contemporaneity involves a dual engagement with one's era, balancing immersion and detachment to critically address the complexities of the present. Building on this theoretical foundation, the thesis delves into the intrinsic relationship between architecture and its theoretical underpinnings. Teresa Stoppani's assertions in "This Thing Called Theory" highlight the indispensable role of architecture theory, positioning it as a critical component that shapes and defines architectural practice. Stoppani, along with scholars like Charles Jencks and K. Michael Hays, emphasizes the dynamic and evolving nature of architecture theory, which continually challenges conventions and fosters deeper understanding through interdisciplinary engagements. The thesis employs an abductive methodology to explore the integration of contemporaneity into architecture theory, using three key terms: "souvenir," "kitsch," and "formless." These terms are selected for their relevance to contemporary discourse and their potential to redefine architectural practices. "Souvenir" symbolizes the temporal interpolation of past and present; "kitsch" reflects the prevailing aesthetic enriched with sentimentality and satire; and "formless" challenges the conventional focus on tangible, structured objects in architecture. Through case studies and post-critical categories, the thesis demonstrates how these concepts can serve as a foundation for architects to reinterpret and demand changes in our built environment, fostering the development of architecture theory that is responsive to contemporary challenges. The ultimate goal is to provide a basis for future architectural practice that embraces the limitless possibilities of redefining and requestioning.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
3 out of infinity_Final_BIR.pdf
accessibile in internet solo dagli utenti autorizzati
Dimensione
2.67 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.67 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in POLITesi sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/10589/222194