The work presented focuses on the development of a scientific method for the qualitative assessment of urban green areas, with the aim of providing a concrete tool for analysis, management and planning of such spaces. Starting from a historical investigation of the evolution of the concept of public space, the research examines the environmental and socio-health benefits of green areas, highlighting the need for an approach that goes beyond mere quantitative aspects and also considers qualitative features. Recognizing the importance of the positive effects of green environments, existing qualitative assessment methodologies (both scientific and literary) were analysed to identify the strengths and limitations of each tool: based on comparative analysis, the foundations were laid for the development of the new scientific method. From the methodological comparison, “PaRKS: Parks Rating and Knowledge System” is developed, a tool structured in three hierarchical levels (domains, indicators, and elements) and calibrated on different dimensional scales of green areas. The innovative aspect of the method lies in its adaptability, depending on the size of the park, through the introduction of “mandatory” and “merit” elements: by filling out based on the “presence/absence” of these items, the qualitative score of the examined space is calculated. The validation of the method occurs through its application in three green areas located in the city of Milan, identified for their dimensional and typological diversity. Nonetheless, the PaRKS methodology could be easily adapted and replicated in other cities, thus contributing to a global network of high-quality green spaces, essential for sustainable cities of the future. The spread of this tool, and its use as a guideline in public administration, will allow the implementation of urban planning that is more attentive to the quality of green areas, consequently increasing environmental benefits, physical and mental wellbeing and sociality.
Il lavoro presentato si concentra sullo sviluppo di un metodo scientifico per la valutazione qualitativa delle aree verdi urbane, con lo scopo di fornire uno strumento concreto per l’analisi, la gestione e la pianificazione di tali spazi. Partendo da un’indagine storica dell’evoluzione del concetto di spazio pubblico, la ricerca indaga i benefici ambientali e sociosanitari delle aree verdi, evidenziando la necessità di un approccio che vada oltre i semplici aspetti quantitativi e che consideri anche le caratteristiche qualitative. Appresa l’importanza degli effetti positivi che porta con sé l’ambiente verde, sono state analizzate le metodologie di valutazione qualitativa esistenti, sia di origine scientifica che letteraria, al fine di individuare i punti di forza e le limitazioni di ciascuno strumento: sulla base dell’analisi comparativa, sono state poste le basi per lo sviluppo del nuovo metodo scientifico. A partire dal confronto metodologico viene sviluppato “PaRKS: Parks Rating and Knowledge System”, uno strumento strutturato in tre livelli gerarchici (domini, indicatori ed elementi) e calibrato su differenti scale dimensionali di aree verdi. L’aspetto innovativo del metodo risiede nella sua capacità di adattamento, a seconda dell’estensione del parco, tramite l’introduzione di elementi “obbligatori” e “premiali”: attraverso la compilazione basata sulla “presenza/assenza” di tali voci, viene calcolato il punteggio qualitativo dello spazio preso in esame. La validazione del metodo avviene attraverso la sua applicazione in tre aree verdi situate nella città di Milano, identificate per la loro diversità dimensionale e tipologica. Ciononostante, la metodologia PaRKS potrebbe essere facilmente adattata e replicata in altre città, contribuendo così a una rete globale di spazi verdi di alta qualità, fondamentali per le città sostenibili del futuro. La diffusione di questo strumento, e il suo utilizzo come linea guida per la pubblica amministrazione, consentiranno di attuare una pianificazione urbana più attenta alla qualità delle aree verdi, incrementando di conseguenza i benefici ambientali, il benessere fisico e mentale e la socialità.
PaRKS: Parks Rating and Knowledge System : sviluppo di un metodo scientifico per la valutazione qualitativa delle aree verdi urbane
Ghensi, Tania;Calderoni, Camilla;Gherbavaz, Sofia
2023/2024
Abstract
The work presented focuses on the development of a scientific method for the qualitative assessment of urban green areas, with the aim of providing a concrete tool for analysis, management and planning of such spaces. Starting from a historical investigation of the evolution of the concept of public space, the research examines the environmental and socio-health benefits of green areas, highlighting the need for an approach that goes beyond mere quantitative aspects and also considers qualitative features. Recognizing the importance of the positive effects of green environments, existing qualitative assessment methodologies (both scientific and literary) were analysed to identify the strengths and limitations of each tool: based on comparative analysis, the foundations were laid for the development of the new scientific method. From the methodological comparison, “PaRKS: Parks Rating and Knowledge System” is developed, a tool structured in three hierarchical levels (domains, indicators, and elements) and calibrated on different dimensional scales of green areas. The innovative aspect of the method lies in its adaptability, depending on the size of the park, through the introduction of “mandatory” and “merit” elements: by filling out based on the “presence/absence” of these items, the qualitative score of the examined space is calculated. The validation of the method occurs through its application in three green areas located in the city of Milan, identified for their dimensional and typological diversity. Nonetheless, the PaRKS methodology could be easily adapted and replicated in other cities, thus contributing to a global network of high-quality green spaces, essential for sustainable cities of the future. The spread of this tool, and its use as a guideline in public administration, will allow the implementation of urban planning that is more attentive to the quality of green areas, consequently increasing environmental benefits, physical and mental wellbeing and sociality.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2025_04_Calderoni_Ghensi_Gherbavaz.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati a partire dal 13/03/2026
Descrizione: Testo della tesi
Dimensione
34.35 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
34.35 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in POLITesi sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/10589/235138