The proliferation of driving automation technologies transforms driving into a collaborative practice termed “co-driving,” where vehicles, imbued with artificial agency, shift from mere tools to active agents. While driving pleasure is significant in manual driving, concerns exist that automation may diminish this enjoyment, potentially hindering technology adoption. Consequently, understanding “co-driving pleasure” within this new paradigm is essential. This research employs Reflective Lifeworld Research, a phenomenological research approach, together with the data gathering method of Trip Experience Sampling to explore this phenomenon among non-professional drivers in everyday scenarios. Two interview rounds were conducted: the first provided primary data; the second triangulated and expanded the findings. Apart from some observations about the current co-driving practice, key results reveal five distinct types (meanings) of co-driving pleasure and five key factors influencing its emergence (verified and expanded through data source triangulation in a second interview session). Theoretically grounded in Technological Mediation Theory and Pleasure Theories in Design, this study introduces the Human-Vehicle Relation (HVR) conceptual tool—a framework with proposed concepts and tools, such as Technological Granularity (via service design touchpoints), the Inscription/Rendering Model, the Dynamic HVR Composition Diagram, and Relation Mode to analyze the complex, mediated relationship between humans and increasingly agentic vehicles. Co-driving pleasure is defined as the positive emotional experience of a human driver in a situated driving context, emerging from the satisfaction of psychological needs during co-driving activities. Crucially, it is conceptualized as an extension, not a replacement, of traditional driving pleasure. The developed Co-Driving Pleasure Model elucidates the mechanism by which this pleasure arises: through the driver’s positive evaluation of how the actualized HVR addresses their situated needs. These findings and theoretical insights were distilled into three core design considerations—namely, leveraging the five influencing factors, considering driver habits, and adopting HVR constructs. Furthermore, this research organized a series of design practitioner talks, involving nine design practitioners, to facilitate the translation of research outcomes into actionable knowledge for design practice. The primary contributions of this PhD thesis are threefold: 1. The HVR conceptual tool, offering an analytical framework for researchers and practitioners to dissect complex human-vehicle interactions and mediation in the context of driving automation. 2. A systematic conceptualization and model of co-driving pleasure, encompassing its definition, identified sub-types, influencing factors, and the mechanism of its emergence (the Co-Driving Pleasure Model) 3. A set of empirically derived design considerations for fostering co-driving pleasure (e.g., leveraging the five influencing factors, considering driver habits, adopting HVR constructs), which were positively evaluated by nine frontline design practitioners. These findings provide a theoretical foundation and practical guidance for Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) researchers and practitioners designing future co-driving experiences. Aiming to advance our understanding and design of complex in-vehicle human experiences better, the study further suggests three main future research directions, including: 1. refining and operationalizing the HVR framework 2. investigating the aesthetics of HVR 3. adopting the insights of HVR aesthetics to generate Human-Machine Interface (HMI) design principles and guidelines
La proliferazione delle tecnologie di automazione della guida sta trasformando la guida in una pratica collaborativa definita "co-driving", in cui i veicoli, dotati di un'agenzialità artificiale, si evolvono da semplici strumenti a veri e propri agenti attivi. Sebbene il piacere di guida sia un aspetto rilevante nella guida manuale, esistono preoccupazioni circa il fatto che l'automazione possa ridurre tale piacere, potenzialmente ostacolando l’adozione della tecnologia. Di conseguenza, comprendere il "piacere del co-driving" all'interno di questo nuovo paradigma risulta essenziale. Questa ricerca adotta il metodo Reflective Lifeworld Research, un approccio fenomenologico, combinato con il metodo di raccolta dati denominato Trip Experience Sampling, per esplorare tale fenomeno tra conducenti non professionisti in contesti di guida quotidiani. Sono stati condotti due cicli di interviste: il primo ha fornito dati primari; il secondo ha consentito la triangolazione e l’espansione dei risultati. Oltre ad alcune osservazioni relative alla pratica attuale del co-driving, i risultati principali evidenziano cinque tipologie (significati) distinte di piacere del co-driving e cinque fattori chiave che ne influenzano l’emergere (verificati e ampliati attraverso la triangolazione delle fonti nella seconda sessione di interviste). Radicata teoricamente nella Teoria della Mediazione Tecnologica e nelle Teorie del Piacere nel Design, questa ricerca introduce lo strumento concettuale della Relazione Uomo-Veicolo (HVR – Human-Vehicle Relation): un quadro teorico che propone concetti e strumenti come la Granularità Tecnologica (tramite touchpoint del service design), il Modello di Inscrizione/Rendere, il Diagramma Dinamico di Composizione HVR e il Modello della Modalità Relazionale, per analizzare la complessa relazione mediata tra esseri umani e veicoli dotati di crescente agentività. Il piacere del co-driving è definito come l’esperienza emotiva positiva vissuta da un conducente umano in un contesto situato di guida, che emerge dalla soddisfazione di bisogni psicologici durante l’attività di co-driving. Fondamentalmente, esso è concettualizzato come un’estensione, e non una sostituzione, del piacere tradizionale della guida. Il Modello del Piacere di Co-Driving sviluppato chiarisce il meccanismo attraverso cui questo piacere emerge: mediante la valutazione positiva, da parte del conducente, di come la HVR attualizzata risponda ai suoi bisogni situati. Questi risultati e approfondimenti teorici sono stati sintetizzati in tre principali considerazioni progettuali: l’utilizzo dei cinque fattori influenti, la considerazione delle abitudini del conducente e l’adozione dei costrutti HVR. Inoltre, la ricerca ha organizzato una serie di incontri con professionisti del design, coinvolgendo nove designer, al fine di facilitare la traduzione dei risultati della ricerca in conoscenza applicabile nella pratica progettuale. I principali contributi di questa tesi di dottorato sono tre: Lo strumento concettuale HVR, che offre un quadro analitico per ricercatori e progettisti per analizzare le complesse interazioni e mediazioni tra esseri umani e veicoli nel contesto dell’automazione della guida. Una concettualizzazione sistematica e un modello del piacere di co-driving, comprensivi della sua definizione, delle tipologie identificate, dei fattori influenti e del meccanismo della sua emergenza (il Modello del Piacere di Co-Driving). Un insieme di considerazioni progettuali derivate empiricamente per promuovere il piacere del co-driving (ad esempio, sfruttare i cinque fattori influenti, considerare le abitudini dei conducenti, adottare i costrutti HVR), che sono stati positivamente valutati da nove professionisti del design operanti in prima linea. Questi risultati offrono una base teorica e indicazioni pratiche per i ricercatori e i progettisti nel campo dell’Interazione Uomo-Macchina (HCI) impegnati nella progettazione delle future esperienze di co-driving. Al fine di progredire nella comprensione e progettazione delle complesse esperienze umane all’interno del veicolo, lo studio propone inoltre tre principali direzioni per ricerche future: il perfezionamento e l’operazionalizzazione del framework HVR; l’esplorazione dell’estetica della HVR; l’adozione delle intuizioni sull’estetica HVR per generare principi e linee guida progettuali per le interfacce uomo-macchina (HMI).
Feeling together with the car: towards theorizing co-driving pleasure from a technological mediation perspective
Lu, Peng
2024/2025
Abstract
The proliferation of driving automation technologies transforms driving into a collaborative practice termed “co-driving,” where vehicles, imbued with artificial agency, shift from mere tools to active agents. While driving pleasure is significant in manual driving, concerns exist that automation may diminish this enjoyment, potentially hindering technology adoption. Consequently, understanding “co-driving pleasure” within this new paradigm is essential. This research employs Reflective Lifeworld Research, a phenomenological research approach, together with the data gathering method of Trip Experience Sampling to explore this phenomenon among non-professional drivers in everyday scenarios. Two interview rounds were conducted: the first provided primary data; the second triangulated and expanded the findings. Apart from some observations about the current co-driving practice, key results reveal five distinct types (meanings) of co-driving pleasure and five key factors influencing its emergence (verified and expanded through data source triangulation in a second interview session). Theoretically grounded in Technological Mediation Theory and Pleasure Theories in Design, this study introduces the Human-Vehicle Relation (HVR) conceptual tool—a framework with proposed concepts and tools, such as Technological Granularity (via service design touchpoints), the Inscription/Rendering Model, the Dynamic HVR Composition Diagram, and Relation Mode to analyze the complex, mediated relationship between humans and increasingly agentic vehicles. Co-driving pleasure is defined as the positive emotional experience of a human driver in a situated driving context, emerging from the satisfaction of psychological needs during co-driving activities. Crucially, it is conceptualized as an extension, not a replacement, of traditional driving pleasure. The developed Co-Driving Pleasure Model elucidates the mechanism by which this pleasure arises: through the driver’s positive evaluation of how the actualized HVR addresses their situated needs. These findings and theoretical insights were distilled into three core design considerations—namely, leveraging the five influencing factors, considering driver habits, and adopting HVR constructs. Furthermore, this research organized a series of design practitioner talks, involving nine design practitioners, to facilitate the translation of research outcomes into actionable knowledge for design practice. The primary contributions of this PhD thesis are threefold: 1. The HVR conceptual tool, offering an analytical framework for researchers and practitioners to dissect complex human-vehicle interactions and mediation in the context of driving automation. 2. A systematic conceptualization and model of co-driving pleasure, encompassing its definition, identified sub-types, influencing factors, and the mechanism of its emergence (the Co-Driving Pleasure Model) 3. A set of empirically derived design considerations for fostering co-driving pleasure (e.g., leveraging the five influencing factors, considering driver habits, adopting HVR constructs), which were positively evaluated by nine frontline design practitioners. These findings provide a theoretical foundation and practical guidance for Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) researchers and practitioners designing future co-driving experiences. Aiming to advance our understanding and design of complex in-vehicle human experiences better, the study further suggests three main future research directions, including: 1. refining and operationalizing the HVR framework 2. investigating the aesthetics of HVR 3. adopting the insights of HVR aesthetics to generate Human-Machine Interface (HMI) design principles and guidelines| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2025_06_Lu.pdf
accessibile in internet per tutti
Dimensione
22.5 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
22.5 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in POLITesi sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/10589/238659