This thesis offers a structured synthesis of recent scholarship to map both objective and perceived risks and to derive design guidelines for products and systems that lower the threshold for sound decisions in off-grid contexts. The review follows the SALSA sequence (Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, Analysis), translating three sub-questions on objective hazards, risk perception and management, mitigation strategies and technologies into fielded searches with a transparent decision trail. The final corpus includes 32 full-text papers coded at document level,. Findings indicate that human factors dominate the discourse. Preparation and risky behaviour appear more frequently than device-centric themes, while objective risk related to weather, terrain, and remoteness provides the constant backdrop. Navigation problems often arise where training and planning are thin, and social influences such as cohesion or status can delay mitigation even when hazards are recognized. Strategies anchored in education and on-site infrastructure emerge as primary levers, with personal technologies like GPS and wearables adding value in narrowly scoped, task specific roles rather than as stand-alone fixes. Building on this evidence, the thesis proposes design criteria that front-load clear group rules and conservative thresholds, deliver brief and aligned cues at decision points, and support group-aware, offline first monitoring that turns minimal signals into shared and interpretable states without replacing judgment. Contributions include a coherent prevention architecture and actionable guidelines for design, while limitations reflect heterogeneity in the evidence base and behavioural boundaries on technology influence.
Questa tesi propone una sintesi strutturata della letteratura recente per mappare i rischi sia oggettivi sia percepiti e per derivare linee guida di design per prodotti e sistemi capaci di assistere il decision making in contesti off grid. La revisione segue la sequenza SALSA (Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, Analysis), traducendo tre sotto-quesiti su pericoli oggettivi, percezione e gestione del rischio, strategie e tecnologie di mitigazione in ricerche mirate con un tracciato decisionale trasparente. Il corpus finale comprende 32 articoli a testo integrale codificati a livello di documento. I risultati indicano che i fattori umani dominano il discorso. Preparazione e comportamenti rischiosi compaiono più spesso dei temi centrati sui dispositivi, mentre il rischio oggettivo legato a meteo, terreno e lontananza costituisce lo sfondo costante. I problemi di navigazione emergono soprattutto dove formazione e pianificazione sono deboli, e dinamiche sociali come coesione o status possono ritardare la mitigazione anche quando i pericoli sono riconosciuti. Le strategie fondate su educazione e infrastrutture in loco risultano le leve principali, mentre le tecnologie personali come GPS e wearable aggiungono valore in ruoli ristretti e a compito specifico, più che come soluzioni autonome. Sulla base di queste evidenze, la tesi propone criteri di design che anticipano regole di gruppo chiare e soglie conservative, forniscono indicazioni brevi e allineate nei punti decisionali e supportano un monitoraggio consapevole del gruppo, offline first, che traduce segnali minimi in stati condivisi e interpretabili senza sostituire il giudizio. I contributi includono un’architettura coerente della prevenzione e linee guida operative per il progetto, mentre le limitazioni riflettono l’eterogeneità della base di evidenze e i confini comportamentali dell’influenza tecnologica.
Design for mountain safety: developing design guidelines for risk prevention products and systems in remote environments
Simplicio, Alessandro
2024/2025
Abstract
This thesis offers a structured synthesis of recent scholarship to map both objective and perceived risks and to derive design guidelines for products and systems that lower the threshold for sound decisions in off-grid contexts. The review follows the SALSA sequence (Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, Analysis), translating three sub-questions on objective hazards, risk perception and management, mitigation strategies and technologies into fielded searches with a transparent decision trail. The final corpus includes 32 full-text papers coded at document level,. Findings indicate that human factors dominate the discourse. Preparation and risky behaviour appear more frequently than device-centric themes, while objective risk related to weather, terrain, and remoteness provides the constant backdrop. Navigation problems often arise where training and planning are thin, and social influences such as cohesion or status can delay mitigation even when hazards are recognized. Strategies anchored in education and on-site infrastructure emerge as primary levers, with personal technologies like GPS and wearables adding value in narrowly scoped, task specific roles rather than as stand-alone fixes. Building on this evidence, the thesis proposes design criteria that front-load clear group rules and conservative thresholds, deliver brief and aligned cues at decision points, and support group-aware, offline first monitoring that turns minimal signals into shared and interpretable states without replacing judgment. Contributions include a coherent prevention architecture and actionable guidelines for design, while limitations reflect heterogeneity in the evidence base and behavioural boundaries on technology influence.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2025_12_Simplicio.pdf
accessibile in internet per tutti
Dimensione
1.43 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.43 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in POLITesi sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/10589/246343