This study examines supplier selection practices in small and medium-sized food-sector businesses (SMEs) in Bangladesh, Thailand, and India. It does this by examining how procurement choices change when there are a lack of information and a high degree of uncertainty. The goal of the research is to create a comprehensive framework that improves decision-making in situations with limited resources by integrating relational governance, behavioral formalization, and analytical feasibility. The study looks at how institutional maturity, governance styles, and national food supply chain structures affect SME procurement. It is based on secondary data and a comparative multiple-case methodology. The suggested model incorporates four complementary methods: a Simplified Decision Tree (SDT) for sequential decision logic, a Lightweight Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model for supplier evaluation, the Kraljic Matrix for portfolio segmentation, and the 4F Governance Framework for mapping relational and institutional maturity. The analysis shows that even in the absence of comprehensive quantitative data, SMEs can implement transparent, structured supplier-selection processes. While qualitative decision rules promote consistency without restricting managerial flexibility, lightweight analytical tools improve comparability and traceability. Across the three national contexts, the results show that analytical feasibility improves with governance maturity: in Bangladesh, tools provide procedural order in informal systems; in India, they complement hybrid governance; and in Thailand, they support compliance and standardisation. The findings also demonstrate that behavioural and relational factors—trust, negotiation, and adaptability—remain central to supplier relationships but progressively become institutionalized within formal frameworks as SMEs mature. The study concludes that effective SME procurement in emerging markets depends not on methodological sophistication but on contextual alignment between analytical tools, behavioural norms, and governance mechanisms. The integrated framework thus provides both a diagnostic and developmental approach to improve supplier evaluation, organizational learning, and resilience in the food industry.
Questo studio esamina le strategie di selezione dei fornitori nelle piccole e medie imprese (PMI) del settore alimentare in India, Bangladesh e Thailandia, analizzando l'evoluzione delle decisioni di approvvigionamento in condizioni di scarsità di dati e alta incertezza. La ricerca mira a sviluppare un quadro integrato che combini fattibilità analitica, formalizzazione comportamentale e governance relazionale per migliorare il processo decisionale in contesti con risorse limitate. Sulla base di dati secondari e di una metodologia comparativa a più casi, lo studio esamina le strutture nazionali della catena di approvvigionamento alimentare, la maturità istituzionale e le modalità di governance che influenzano gli appalti delle PMI. Il modello proposto integra quattro approcci complementari: la matrice di Kraljic per la segmentazione del portafoglio, il framework di governance 4F per la mappatura della maturità relazionale e istituzionale, un modello di processo decisionale multicriterio leggero (MCDM) per la valutazione dei fornitori e un albero decisionale semplificato (SDT) per la logica decisionale sequenziale. L'analisi rivela che le PMI possono adottare metodi di selezione dei fornitori strutturati e trasparenti anche in assenza di dati quantitativi esaurienti. Strumenti analitici leggeri migliorano la comparabilità e la tracciabilità, mentre le regole decisionali qualitative facilitano la coerenza senza limitare la flessibilità manageriale. Nei tre contesti nazionali, i risultati mostrano che la fattibilità analitica migliora con la maturità della governance: in Bangladesh, gli strumenti forniscono ordine procedurale nei sistemi informali; in India, integrano la governance ibrida; e in Thailandia supportano la conformità e la standardizzazione. I risultati dimostrano anche che i fattori comportamentali e relazionali – fiducia, negoziazione e adattabilità – rimangono centrali nelle relazioni con i fornitori, ma vengono progressivamente istituzionalizzati all'interno di quadri formali man mano che le PMI maturano. Lo studio conclude che l'approvvigionamento sostenibile delle PMI nei mercati emergenti non dipende dalla sofisticazione metodologica, ma dall'allineamento contestuale tra strumenti analitici, norme comportamentali e meccanismi di governance. Il quadro integrato fornisce quindi un approccio diagnostico e di sviluppo per migliorare la valutazione dei fornitori, l'apprendimento organizzativo e la resilienza nell'industria alimentare.
Supplier selection strategies in asian food SMEs: A framework-based approach to decision-making under resource constraints
Joseph Devadass, Sharon Roselyn
2025/2026
Abstract
This study examines supplier selection practices in small and medium-sized food-sector businesses (SMEs) in Bangladesh, Thailand, and India. It does this by examining how procurement choices change when there are a lack of information and a high degree of uncertainty. The goal of the research is to create a comprehensive framework that improves decision-making in situations with limited resources by integrating relational governance, behavioral formalization, and analytical feasibility. The study looks at how institutional maturity, governance styles, and national food supply chain structures affect SME procurement. It is based on secondary data and a comparative multiple-case methodology. The suggested model incorporates four complementary methods: a Simplified Decision Tree (SDT) for sequential decision logic, a Lightweight Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model for supplier evaluation, the Kraljic Matrix for portfolio segmentation, and the 4F Governance Framework for mapping relational and institutional maturity. The analysis shows that even in the absence of comprehensive quantitative data, SMEs can implement transparent, structured supplier-selection processes. While qualitative decision rules promote consistency without restricting managerial flexibility, lightweight analytical tools improve comparability and traceability. Across the three national contexts, the results show that analytical feasibility improves with governance maturity: in Bangladesh, tools provide procedural order in informal systems; in India, they complement hybrid governance; and in Thailand, they support compliance and standardisation. The findings also demonstrate that behavioural and relational factors—trust, negotiation, and adaptability—remain central to supplier relationships but progressively become institutionalized within formal frameworks as SMEs mature. The study concludes that effective SME procurement in emerging markets depends not on methodological sophistication but on contextual alignment between analytical tools, behavioural norms, and governance mechanisms. The integrated framework thus provides both a diagnostic and developmental approach to improve supplier evaluation, organizational learning, and resilience in the food industry.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2025_12_Joseph_Devadass.pdf
non accessibile
Descrizione: Text of the thesis
Dimensione
1.67 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.67 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in POLITesi sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/10589/247014